<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Two Worlds TechnoGear Feed</title>
<description></description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:50:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.2</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 
<item>
<title>First Impressions: Apple iPhone</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>
<div class="imagelink-right">
<a href="http://www.two-worlds.com/iphone.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://www.two-worlds.com/iphone.jpg','popup','width=137,height=250,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.two-worlds.com/iphone-tm.jpg" height="100" width="54" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Iphone" /></a>
</div>I've been waiting for this. I've been waiting a long, long time. In fact ever since I first cabled my Apple Newton to my Nokia phone and managed to get a feeble-but-exciting GSM data signal from within the bunker of the Palais de Congres in Cannes (it was a very very tedious conference session). And that was fifteen years after my first mobile computing experience &ndash;&nbsp;an only approximately luggable Texas Instruments thermal printer terminal with a built-in acoustic coupler: the first mobile combo device. Since then, I've been through the mobile mill: I've carried around every 'mobile' device Apple ever made (if you've ever played with a Newton, you'll understand the quotification of 'mobile'), helped design a couple of them and, when Steve The Revenant canned the Newton in a Learish fit of Alpha Male pique, I reluctantly went over to and through various incarnations of the Palm. Compared to the Newton, it was but a nursery toy but it did have the major advantage of being truly pocketable, unlike the dear old Newt. Along the way I dallied with an early incarnation of the iPaq - for about three days, after which I returned it as "unfit for purpose" - to say that I was disenchanted with PocketPC (as it then was) was a galactic level understatement.
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.two-worlds.com/2007/01/first_impressions_th.html</link>
<guid>http://www.two-worlds.com/2007/01/first_impressions_th.html</guid>
<category>TechnoGear</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Apotheosis of the PowerBook</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>
The <a href="http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/" title="MacBook Pro Info">MacBook Pro</a> is a very cool, very fast and very shiny computer. But, as of now, largely pointless for me: until such time as core applications for the photographer and image munger are released as Universal Binaries, I'd simply be paying more for a machine that ran Photoshop and its ilk more slowly than my existing machine (under the <a href="http://www.apple.com/rosetta/" title="Rosetta Info">Rosetta</a> emulation environment), and which wouldn't run some plug-ins at all. Unless I was using <a href="http://www.apple.com/aperture/" title="Aperture Info">Aperture</a> as the heart of my workflow (which I can't, due to its current, "limitations" in RAW conversion), the only benefit would be that the Finder, email and text editor would run ludicrously fast (and they're fine already). The first generation MacBook Pro has also taken <a href="http://www.two-worlds.com/2006/01/the_powerbook_is_dea_1.html" title="MacBook Pro Issues">some backward steps</a> in its specification that smack of a rush to market.
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.two-worlds.com/2006/03/apotheosis_of_the_po.html</link>
<guid>http://www.two-worlds.com/2006/03/apotheosis_of_the_po.html</guid>
<category>Mac and Back</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Powerbook is Dead&hellip;]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>
&hellip;Long live the, ah, MacBook. 
</p>
<p>
So we're starting with sad note in technohistory:  I've been surgically attached to both the name and entity of Powerbook since it first appeared rather more than fourteen years (and to my laughingly named Mac “Portable” before that), so I'm unlikely to convert to the casual dropping of, “I'll just grab my MacBook&hellip;” overnight. Or possibly not ever. And what happens when Apple migrates their Power Mac range to Intel - do we end up with the Mac Mac?
</p>
<p>
But enough of the sentimental maundering &ndash;&nbsp;this is supposed to be about what the Intel shift means to travelling photographers and meedja types, for whom a &lt;whatever&gt;Book is their weapon of choice, and for those Wintel frustratees who are considering a shift, now that direct platform comparisons are possible for the first time.
</p>
<p>
First things first, then &ndash;&nbsp;just what is a MacBook, and what's changed from the previous generation of PowerPC-based machines?
</p>
<h2 class="title-left">Design</h2>
<p>
A <a href="http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/whatsinside.html" target="_blank" title="MacBook Pro specification">full specification</a> is available on the Apple web site, so I'm not going to reiterate that, but concentrate on what's changed, for better and worse. The basic industrial design remains as for the <a href="http://www.apple.com/powerbook/index15.html" target="_blank" title="Powerbook G4 specification">15“ Aluminium PowerBooks</a>, albeit in a case that's 1cm wider than before, but a couple of mm slimmer &ndash;&nbsp;almost back to the thickness of the PowerBook Ti. Depth remains the same. Strange to tell, that little extra slimness is much more significant for travelling than the extra centimeter of width &ndash;&nbsp;I'll happily trade a bit of footprint for something I can stuff into the narrowest possible space in a crowded equipment bag. A good start then. Now for the rest&hellip;
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.two-worlds.com/2006/01/the_powerbook_is_dea_1.html</link>
<guid>http://www.two-worlds.com/2006/01/the_powerbook_is_dea_1.html</guid>
<category>TechnoGear</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Router Madness</title>
<description><![CDATA[<h1>
Netgear DG814
</h1>
<p>
I live in the country, in a place where the beer is real, wellies are green and broadband is something of a latecomer. In fact I didn't get broadband in this corner of Surrey until two years ago, at which point, and after years of reliable ISDN service from my old faithful <a href="http://www.netopia.com/equipment/routers/" title="Netopia Routers">Netopia 3100</a> router in connecting to both the Net and our corporate Cisco-based systems, I leapt excitedly on the DSL bandwagon with a <a href="http://kbserver.netgear.com/products/dg814.asp" title="Netgear DG814">Netgear DG814</a>.  Now I'd modestly reckon that I'm usually pretty good at assessing technology and getting it right (it being part of my job'n'all&hellip;), but, as what followed demonstrated, I do seem to have developed a rather Nelsonian blind spot with regard to low-end routers&hellip;
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.two-worlds.com/2005/08/router_madness.html</link>
<guid>http://www.two-worlds.com/2005/08/router_madness.html</guid>
<category>TechnoGear</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>